|
HURILAWS advances
human rights in Nigeria using the following tools, among
others:
HURILAWS is an independent, non-profit
service, dedicated to providing public interest and
human rights law services to advance the legal
protection of human rights. HURILAWS assists victims,
lawyers, judges and NGOs in the preparation of cases
before the courts; conducts workshops and seminars on
reforming the administration of justice; publishes ‘The
HURILAWS NEWSLETTER’ to ensure that developments in
human rights law and practice are widely disseminated;
utilizes regional and international human rights treaty
mechanisms to establish judicial norms. HURILAWS has
working relations with the Episcopal Commission for
Justice, Development & Peace Commission of the Catholic
Secretariat of Nigeria and the Inter-African Network for
Human Rights & Development (AFRONET). HURILAWS holds
Observer Status with the African Commission on Human and
Peoples' Rights.
An independent, non-profit service,
HURILAWS is dependent on support from grant makers and
donations from individual supporters.
Back to top
Origin of HURILAWS
A 1995 country study of the legal
protection of human rights in Nigeria by Olisa Agbakoba
for the International Centre for the Legal protection of
Human Rights [INTERIGHTS] and the Inter-African Network
for Human Rights and Development [AFRONET] identified a
critical need for specialist human rights law service
providers.
This need derived from the history and
structure of the human rights movement in Nigeria. Human
rights activism in Nigeria has focused primarily on
campaigning, documentation, research and advocacy on
violations and abuses of human rights. Nigerian NGOs
acquired considerable expertise in investigating,
monitoring and reporting of human rights abuses and
campaigning to eradicate these abuses. By the early
1990s, a degree of specialization had developed among
Nigerian NGOs along ‘strategy’ and ‘issue’ lines. Some
NGOs employed litigation as a tool for advancing their
respective causes from the death penalty to gender
equity, but this was largely on an ad hoc basis.
Experience has shown that while conventional human
rights organizations are well suited to investigating
and reporting on human rights violations, they do not
necessarily have the time, resources or capacity to
effectively engage in public interest litigation.
HURILAWS was established to advance human
rights through organized and consistent public interest
litigation. We decided to specialize in this field as a
result of the absence of specialist human rights
litigators. We considered that the provision of a
specialist public and human rights law services,
provided by legal professionals with extensive expertise
in the field, would benefit civil society and advance
the development of a rights-based jurisprudence.
The legal professionals at HURILAWS have
extensive experience in litigating human rights cases
under the aegis of the law firm of Olisa Agbakoba and
Associates. Much of the human rights litigation done by
the legal staff of Olisa Agbakoba & Associates in the
months prior to January 1997 dovetailed into activities
under HURILAWS. They are committed to using their
experience to assist not only individual victims of
human rights abuses, but also civil society
institutions, disadvantaged communities and groups,
youth organizations, community-based organizations and
trade unions.
The core activities of HURILAWS are
public interest and human rights litigation, legislative
advocacy and legal assistance.
Back to top
Objectives
-
Establishing human rights legal
standards and advancing the application of human rights norms through high test cases
-
Promoting legal and judicial
reform through legislative advocacy
-
Providing legal assistance to
disadvantaged persons, communities and groups
-
Advancing the application of
international legal instruments on human rights in
Nigerian law
-
Advancing the application of social
and economic rights in Nigerian law through
legislative advocacy and constitutional litigation.
-
Facilitating collaboration with
national and international NGOs to promote good
governance through law in Africa.
-
Undertaking any other
programmes, activities and initiatives that can
secure and enhance the above objectives.
HURILAWS Structure
HURILAWS is a registered charity
(Non-Governmental organization) under the Companies and Allied
Matters Decree 1 of 1990 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It
is registered with a Board of Trustees and organized around an
Advisory Board and a Management Board. The Advisory Board sets
policy for the organisation while the Management Board deals
with the daily management and administration of the
organization.
Back
to top
HURILAWS Activities
-
Public Interest Litigation
-
Legal Aid Scheme
-
Legislative Advocacy
-
Legal/Judicial Sector Reform
-
Constitutional Reform
-
Electoral Reform
-
Human Rights/Clinical Law Education
-
Regional and International Programmes
-
Institutional
and Regulatory Reforms
____________________________________
(a)
Public Interest Litigation
-
HURILAWS has since 1998 litigated on
constitutional matters in the following fields:
-
Expansion of Access to Courts,
-
Justiciability and Enforceability of Social and
Economic Rights,
-
Environmental Rights Enforcement,
-
Housing Rights,
-
Administrative Detention,
-
Freedom of Information,
-
Constitutionality of the Death Penalty,
-
Death Row Conditions,
-
Bail Procedure,
-
Prison Condition,
-
Election Tribunal Petitions
-
Litigation to expand the process of registration of
political parties, etc.
The Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
programme has produced landmark groundbreaking
decisions in diverse fields of constitutional and
public law.
The core litigation programme is the
Strategic Impact Litigation (SIL) Project - a broad
based test case litigation programme to bring
selected human rights cases before the superior
courts to establish and advance judicial norms on
human rights in Nigerian law. Selected legal/human
rights themes include:
-
The constitutionality of the
"Holding Charge Syndrome" (the long-term
incarceration on remand without trial of
suspected criminals in Nigeria). HURILAWS has
pursued n Bayo Johnson this campaign up to the
Supreme Court in Nigeria, and in planning to
approach the African Commission on Human Rights
and ECOWAS Court. Section 236 of the Criminal
Procedure Act, the enabling provision for virtually
indefinite remand to prison custody, was also
invalidated on constitutional grounds.
-
The
status and application of social and economic rights
established under the AfricanCharter on Human and
People's Rights in Nigerian law
-
State
provision of legal assistance
-
Penal
Reform
-
Death
Row conditions in Nigerian prisons.
-
Admissibility
of wrongfully obtained criminal evidence
-
Open
standing
-
Electoral
Law Reform
-
Establishing
and advancing environmental rights
-
Advancing
women’s rights through litigation
Back to top
(b)
Legal Aid Scheme
HURILAWS provides legal aid/assistance to
victims of human rights violations and has been working
on the reform of the Criminal Justice system since 1997.
From mid 1997, HURILAWS and the Inter-African Network
for Human Rights and Development (AFRONET), in
collaboration with the Justice Development and Peace
Commission (JDPC) of the Catholic Secretariat of
Nigeria,
executed a pilot project in 2 Lagos prisons to test the
feasibility of a major national initiative to decongest
prison populations, by securing the discharge of
Awaiting Trial Persons. HURILAWS continued with the JDPC
and carried out extensive legal aid programmes to
decongest Nigeria's overcrowded prisons. This was done
in phases under the HURILAWS' National Prison Project
and
began with Project 500, which provided legal services to
500 indigent Awaiting Trial Prisoners [ATPs] in two (2)
Lagos prisons. Project 500 was very successful and its
successful implementation provided HURILAWS with the
technical skills and practical experience for the
implementation of the second phase of the National
Prison Project, the Enugu Prison project and the third
phase, Project 100. The Enugu Prison Project (EPP) was
borne out of the need to decongest, improve and bring
relief to prisoners and their living conditions in the
prisons.
The need for this service became apparent
when Olisa Agbakoba, HURILAWS’ Senior Counsel, was
detained at the Enugu prison in 1998, by the former
maximum ruler, the late General Sanni Abacha. His
experiences confirmed the belief that Nigerian prisons
are under pressure arising from congestion and poor
living conditions. With the release of our Senior
Counsel from Enugu prisons in 1998, HURILAWS
launched the Enugu Prisons Project (EPP) that released
579 ATPS. The project brought to the public view
and the government’s attention, the conditions of death
row inmates. The then Federal military government, led
by Rtd. General Abdusalami Abubaka, commissioned judges
to sit in the prisons to hear cases without the usual
problem of transporting the prisoners to
court, which is one of the main causes of delays in
court processes. HURILAWS also got involved with the
Presidential Committee on Prison Decongestion, which
made a total of 7,000 releases across Nigeria’s prisons
in 1999. HURILAWS and the National Human Rights
Commission had been creating awareness on Nigeria’s
overflowing prisons and their deplorable living
conditions. The then Federal
military government, led by Rtd. General
Abdusalami Abubaka, set up a task force on prison
decongestion in 1998 to make recommendations on the
release of prisoners across Nigeria. A staff of HURILAWS
was a member of the Committee and he made a case for
death row prisoners and their living conditions and the
Committee started deliberating on the status of death
row inmates and condemned men and made recommendations
for their release, which resulted in some of them being
granted amnesty and released.
EPP addressed some of the problems
identified in the prison. Test cases, Edmund
Okoro & 66 Ors v The Comptroller of Prison, Enugu and
Arthur Onyejekwe Vs Comptroller, Prison Services, Enugu
& Anor. were used in this regard to
challenge the prolonged incarceration on death row and
pitiable conditions of death row inmates and to
establish the principle that a prisoner has a right to
counsel of choice at the earliest opportunity after
arrest. In June 1998, HURILAWS filed a case at the
Federal High Court, Enugu, to stop further execution of
death row inmates until the issue of its
constitutionality was determined. The Federal High Court
Judge of Enugu State granted this prayer pending the
Supreme Court’s decision on two of our cases, Onuoha Kalu v the State and Azeez
Okoro v the State, challenging the
constitutionality and application of the death penalty
and death row conditions. Unfortunately, HURILAWS lost
the suit in December 1998 at the Supreme Court in Abuja,
which affirmed and upheld the constitutionality of the
death penalty and ruled that the court lacked
jurisdiction to annul the death penalty because it is a
matter that can only be decided by the legislature, and
Nigeria was not yet a democratic state. As a result, we
decided to carry our campaign against the death penalty
to the House of Representatives when Nigeria would
become a democracy. For Public Advocacy, HURILAWS
organised enlightenment campaigns with Amnesty
International, Nigeria Section, on the need for the
abolition of the death penalty.
In January 2000, President Olusegun
Obasanjo granted amnesty to some categories of death row
inmates to the effect that those that had spent up to 20
years and above in prison custody should be released
unconditionally, while those that had spent up to 10
years and less than 20 years should have their death
sentences commuted to life imprisonment. The problem
then arose as to how to determine the actual date prison
custody began to run. Would it be from the date of first
detention or the date of conviction? The prison
officials at Enugu prison were of the opinion that the
date should be calculated from the date of conviction
but HURILAWS was of the opinion that the date should be
calculated from the date of detention. On this wise,
HURILAWS had to go to court in May 2000 to determine the
actual date. HURILAWS won the case in February 2001, at
Enugu State High Court, in Edmund Okoro & 69
Ors v The Minister of Internal Affairs, Attorney General
of the Federation & The Comptroller General, Nigerian
Prisons Service. The Judge, after
considering the facts of the case before him, ruled in
HURILAWS’ favour that the date should be calculated from
the date of first detention. We are pushing for the
calculation to be implemented across Nigerian prisons
and not just for the prisoners on whose behalf we went
to court. When this is done many death row inmates would
be released.
HURILAWS launched another prison project
called Project 1000, in late 1998, to release 1000 ATP's
across Nigerian prisons. The project was supported by
MISEREOR, Germany and the European Union (EU). In 2002,
we concluded another Project 1000, supported by the Open
Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA), which
released 1000 ATPs from South-East and South-West
Prisons in Nigeria. The experiences gathered in the
implementation of these projects have motivated and
empowered HURILAWS to develop and set up Project 5000,
the sixth phase of our National Prison Project. We
recognise that providing legal aid alone is only a
short-term measure to prison decongestion. While making
retail releases, we have to develop the medium and
long-term measures which would be, putting in place a
standard penal policy that would be easy to implement
and would meet International standards like the Standard
Minimum Rules [SMRs] for the treatment of Prisoners
adopted by the 1st United Nations Congress on
the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders,
held in Geneva 1955, and subsequently approved by the
United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1957 and
1977. We are motivated to do this by the realisation
that an effective national administration of justice
system is the key to human rights protection and
critical to restoring the rule of law in Nigeria. In
this regard, HURILAWS has been working with the British
Council, Lagos and the Nigerian Institute of Advanced
Legal Studies [NIALS], Lagos since 1997 on court
procedures, tagged the Nigerian Court Procedures Project
[NCPP], to unearth the problems of slow court processes.
The slow pace of judicial processes, alongside undue
delays and incessant adjournments that have become
endemic in the Nigerian Judicial System, has ensured
that many suspects remain in prison for unusually long
and often indeterminate periods of time before their
cases are ultimately disposed of. The project
discovered that slow court processes caused by a myriad
of problems is a big contributory factor to prison
congestion and so a set of rules are being drafted and
printed by HURILAWS on reforming court procedures in
Nigeria which will positively impact on the criminal
justice system. The ripple effect on prison decongestion
is all too obvious. In addition, to reforming penal
policies of Nigeria, HURILAWS have used some dockets in
our Strategic Impact Litigation Project (SIL) to
challenge some of the practices of the Judicial and
Criminal Justice sectors that fuel prison congestion.
Some of the projects are the HOLDING CHARGE PROJECT and
the DEATH PENALTY PROJECT.
Further, in mid 2000, HURILAWS, with the
support and collaboration of USAID, held a multi-donor
Stakeholders Forum on Legal and Justice Sector Reform
and there it was recognised that one of the central
themes of justice sector reform is the reform of the
Nigerian prison system. HURILAWS is also taking this
forward by organising a stakeholders forum on penal
reform, which will bring together NGOs and government
bodies working on penal reform to identify areas of
interest and harmonise ways of effectively carrying out
penal reform and development of alternative to prison
custody programmes.
We have also developed and published a
Prisoner’s Rights Manual, as part of our legal advisory
service to prisoners, which was supported by the French
Embassy in Nigeria.
Back to top
(c)
Legislative Advocacy
In June
1999, HURILAWS commenced the implementation of a
Legislative Advocacy Programme to promote and support
the quality of legislation. HURILAWS developed 37
legislative proposals and submitted bills to the
National Assembly namely: Electoral Reform, Anti-Trust,
Gender Equality Commission and Disabilities
Discrimination, etc.
(d)
Legal and Judicial Sector Reform
HURILAWS has done extensive work in
Legal and Judicial sector reforms. Access to justice and
civil justice reform are core activities of HURILAWS. In
1997, we began a project tagged the Nigerian Court
Procedures Project (NCPP), which was an initiative to
strengthen the capacity of the Nigerian judiciary to
protect human rights. The project was done in
collaboration with the Nigerian Institute of Advanced
Legal Studies (NIALS) of the University of Lagos, and
supported by The British Council, Lagos, and the
Australian Embassy, Lagos (1997-1999). The project
objective was to significantly reduce or eliminate
delays in trials, including especially human rights
cases, by reforming the civil procedures system in
Nigerian superior courts. This project produced a Model
Civil Procedure Rules for the High Courts and Courts of
Appeal in Nigeria, and was adopted by the Lagos State
government. HURILAWS also organized four roundtables for
stakeholders in the Justice sector on behalf of a
multi-donor group (World Bank, USAID, DfID, Government
of Japan, European Union) in 2000. HURILAWS led an
initiative with the Nigerian Bar Association [NBA] and
the Multi-Sector Law Group (MSLG) to produce a National
Action Plan for Justice Sector Reform in Nigeria.
HURILAWS also produced a Model Electoral Law for
enactment in the National Assembly.
HURILAWS
has published a lot of books, among which is the Model
Civil Procedure Rules of High Courts and Appeal Courts,
which deals with issues in Legal and Justice Sector
Reform to help reform the Justice system in Nigeria.
HURILAWS worked with the British Council, Lagos and the
Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies [NIALS]
Lagos, since 1997 on court procedures, tagged the
Nigerian Court Procedures Project [NCPP], to unearth the
problems of slow court processes. The slow pace of
judicial processes, alongside undue delays and incessant
adjournments that have become endemic in the Nigerian
Judicial System, has ensured that many suspects remained
in prison for unusually long and often indeterminate
periods of time before their cases are ultimately
disposed of. The project discovered that slow court
processes caused by a myriad of problems is a big
contributory factor to prison congestion and so a set of
rules were drafted and printed by HURILAWS on reforming
court procedures in Nigeria which will positively impact
on the criminal justice system. The ripple effect on
prison decongestion is all too obvious. The rules were
incorporated into the Lagos State revised Civil
Procedure Rules in 2002. In addition to reforming penal
policies of Nigeria, HURILAWS has used some dockets in
the Strategic Impact Litigation (SIL) Project to
challenge some of the practices of the Judicial and
Criminal Justice sectors that fuel prison congestion.
Some of the projects are the HOLDING CHARGE PROJECT and
the DEATH PENALTY PROJECT (1997-2000).
Back to top
(e)
Constitutional Reform
HURILAWS
has produced a Model Constitution to enrich the
conversations and discussions in respect of
constitutional reform in Nigeria. HURILAWS has also
published a civic education Manual for the Legal
Community in Nigeria, on Constitutional matters.
(f)
Electoral Reform
HURILAWS
conducted civic education prior to the 1999 elections in
Nigeria, as part of the Transition Monitoring Group
(TMG). We also took part in monitoring the actual
elections. In March 2001, a Model Electoral Law for
Nigeria was published by HURILAWS and submitted to the
National Assembly. The model was based on the Electoral
Bill submitted by the Independent National Electoral
Commission [INEC] to the National Assembly for passage
into law. A public hearing was held to discuss the bill.
Again in 2003, we reviewed the Model Electoral Bill and
made amendments, which was then resubmitted to the
National Assembly.
In 2002, HURILAWS produced a Manual on
Managing Election Conflicts in Nigeria. It was later
reviewed in 2003 with support from National Endowment
for Democracy (NED), USA. This Manual was used as a
resource tool to train at the provincial level, the
Catholic Church election monitors in Benue, Anambra and
Enugu states. Transition Monitoring Group & United
Nations Electoral Assistance Division, also supported
this project.
HURILAWS observed and through its Senior
Counsel, participated in the election petition tribunals
and suits in Anambra and Plateau states in 1999 and 2003
respectively. As a result of its observation, made
several publications to aid easier understanding of the
electoral process by simplifying the electoral law for
the common man.
HURILAWS was a member of the Civil
Society Engagement Secretariat for the National
Political Reforms Conference and made significant
contributions on electoral reforms to the Conference. It
was incorporated into the Senate President’s expert
think tank on electoral reforms. A body charged with
making recommendations to the Senate President on
electoral reforms.
HURILAWS has drafted Election Petition
Rules, which it has presented to the President of the
Court of Appeal. Consultations are still on going on the
recommendations, principal among which is the provision
granting the President of the Court of Appeal the powers
to draft the election petition rules.
Back to top
(g)
Human Rights Education
A key
component of HURILAWS’ human rights education programme
is the HURILAWS quarterly Roundtable, where Guest
Speakers discuss topical issues. Eminent persons like
Prof. Larry Diamond of the US, former US Ambassador to
Nigeria Mr. Walter Carrington, former Executive
Secretary of the Nigerian National Human Rights
Commission, Dr. Mohammed , among others,
have been guest speakers at the roundtable. The HURILAWS
Newsletter, a quarterly review of human rights
law and practice is another publication primarily
directed at the legal community.
(h)
Regional and International Programmes
HURILAWS
utilises regional and international mechanisms for
protecting and promoting human rights including the
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights and the
UN treaty mechanisms.
HURILAWS is working to secure the
ratification by Nigeria and the incorporation into
Nigerian law of the international instruments
establishing the African Court on Human and Peoples'
Rights and the International Criminal Court.
HURILAWS promoted platforms to create
linkages in the NGO community. HURILAWS organized a West
African Human Rights Consultative Forum and collaborated
with the Civil Liberties Organization [CLO] in hosting
an African Democracy Forum (ADF) in Abuja in 2000. In
July 2001, HURILAWS, in collaboration with AFRONET and
the CLO, hosted the first parallel OAU/AU NGO summit in
Lusaka, Zambia.
HURILAWS
holds Observer Status with the African Commission on
Human and Peoples’ Rights and has been participating at
the Commission’s sessions since 1997.
Back to top
(i)
Publications
HURILAWS
publishes the HURILAWS Newsletter, a
quarterly review of human rights law and practice. The
publication is primarily directed at the legal
community.
As
part of the campaign to disseminate developments in
human rights and public interest law, HURILAWS has
published a number of books, which include but not
limited to:
-
HURILAWS Legislative Agenda for Good
Governance in Nigeria (1999)
-
Advancing Human Rights in the Fourth
Republic: Prospects and Challenges (1999)
-
Proposed Model Constitution (2000)
-
Model Electoral Law for Nigeria (Proposed
for Adoption) (2001)
-
Controlling Epidemic Corruption in Nigeria
(1999)
-
Proposed Model Civil Procedure Rules
-
Citizens' National Assembly Handbook (2001)
-
Legislative Advocacy for Good Governance
(2003-2007)
-
Governance Scorecard Report (2000, 2001 &
2002 editions)
-
Budget Analysis: Test for Progressive
Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (2001)
-
Managing Election Conflicts in Nigeria
(2002).
-
Legal Advisory Services for prisoners (2003)
-
Managing Election Conflicts in Nigeria
(Revised Edition) (2003)
-
Where did we go wrong? A Review of the 2003
General Elections in Nigeria (2004)
-
Model Electoral Law for Nigeria (Revised)
(2001)
-
Model Civil Procedure Rules (2001)
-
Manual on Election Petitions (2003)
-
Electoral Act 2002 at a Glance (2003)
-
Legal Advisory Manual for Prisoners (2003)
-
Handbook on Death Penalty: Towards a
Moratorium in Nigeria (2003)
-
Local Government Administration and
Development (2004)
-
The Rope: (2004)
-
Contextualizing NEEDS Economic/Political
Reform in Nigeria (2004)
-
Travesty of Justice ( 2004)
-
Controlling Endemic Corruption in Nigeria -
Revised Edition (April 2005).
-
On the Gallows: Advocacy book on death
penalty abolition. (May 2005)
-
Enforcing Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights in Nigeria: Rhetorics or Reality?
(2005)
-
HURILAWS Annual Report and Accounts
(2002-2004)
-
Proposed Draft Election Petition
Rules (2006)
-
Manual on Election Petitions in
Nigeria (A Toolkit for the Legal Community - Revised
Edition) (2006)
-
Justice through Injustice:
Re-examining the Holding Charge (2006)
-
Manual on Election Petitions in
Nigeria (A Toolkit for the Legal Community -
RE-PRINT Revised Edition) (2007)
-
Budget Analysis II (1999-2007) Test
for Progressive Realization of the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) in Nigeria. (2007)
-
Abridge and Simplified Administration
of Criminal Justice Bill (2007)
-
Policy Document on Advocacy for
Women's Inheritance Rights in South East, Nigeria
(2007)
These Publications are available
at our Office.
Back to
top
|